Principal Financial Group

Simplifying a complex advisor platform.

An enterprise financial-advisor experience with approximately 3,000 pages, years of technical debt, and very limited existing understanding of its actual users.

Redesigned advisor portal homepage with commissions, alerts, news and a searchable client list
Role
UX Lead
Scope
UX Research, Interaction Design, UI Design
Product
Financial Advisor Platform
Timeline
Approximately 8 months
Scale
Approximately 3,000-page existing experience

The problem

Years of complexity had accumulated around the people trying to do the work.

The existing technology license was approaching expiration, and the experience had collected years of technical debt along the way. Organizational silos had each added their own content and entry points, and the result was a bloated site of roughly 3,000 pages.

Very little was known about the advisors themselves. I was the first UX person on the project to speak directly with the people using the platform every day.

Large audit map of the existing advisor platform showing laptop and mobile screen inventories
An inventory of the existing experience across laptop and mobile—an early look at how much had accumulated.

What I uncovered

Before simplifying the product, I needed to understand how advisors actually used it.

Recorded advisor sessions alongside a synthesis chart ranking the most frequently raised topics
Interviews and observation sessions with advisors, synthesized into the topics that came up most often.

I started by mapping and evaluating the existing experience. A heuristic evaluation captured screens, usability issues, recurring patterns, and severity across the platform. I combined that with interviews, contextual observation, and task-based testing to see where expert evaluation and actual user behavior aligned.

The pattern was clear: advisors needed less complexity, flatter navigation, better search, and important information closer to where they worked.

  • Simplify: reduce what advisors have to move through.
  • Make features and content earn their place.
  • Flatten navigation instead of adding more of it.
  • Bring important information closer to the homepage.
  • Make primary search significantly more useful.

From evidence to direction

The answer wasn't more navigation. It was less distance between advisors and what they needed.

Each finding translated into a decision about structure: flatten navigation, remove unnecessary complexity, surface frequently needed information earlier, improve primary search, and take unnecessary steps out of important workflows.

Current flow compared with a proposed new flow and homepage wireframe options for an advisor task
Comparing the current flow for a common advisor task against a shorter proposed flow, with homepage wireframe options explored alongside it.

What changed

Critical information moved closer to the work.

Instead of requiring advisors to hunt through the experience, the redesigned homepage brings frequently needed information forward: commissions, client information, important alerts, and the other things advisors reach for every day.

Before and after comparison of the advisor homepage with annotations describing the problems and improvements
Before: a large hero, a link farm, and alerts that often weren't relevant. After: commissions, alerts and the client list out front, with one clearer search.
Final redesigned advisor homepage in detail
The final homepage: commissions and client list in one place, with alerts shown inline where advisors are already working.
  • Commissions moved out front rather than being buried.
  • The client list sits on the homepage, with status and alerts inline.
  • One search, with more visual focus, replaced competing entry points.
  • Modern UI aligned to the brand, replacing the outdated interface.

5 unnecessary steps removed

A primary advisor workflow was simplified by removing five unnecessary steps.

  • Important information was brought closer to the homepage.
  • Navigation was simplified.
  • Research created direct understanding of advisor needs.
  • Product decisions were grounded in observed user behavior.

What this work demonstrates

Making complexity useful.

This work required more than redesigning screens. It meant understanding how years of organizational and product complexity affected everyday work, then using evidence to decide what deserved to remain, what needed to move, and what could disappear.

Work with me

Have a product problem you're trying to figure out?

Tell me what's happening. We can figure out whether Express UX can help.